In
an
error-ridden op-ed in Friday's Los Angeles Times (10/17/08),
Pepperdine law professor
Douglas Kmiec makes the
outrageous claim that Barack Obama "has held himself out as a bridge builder" on the
issue of abortion. Kmiec then advances a fallacious case that a faithful
Catholic can vote in clear conscience for Barack Obama.
A "bridge builder" on abortion? Is Kmiec kidding?? Consider:
-
Obama has forcefully vowed that his very first act as
President would be to sign the
Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA). FOCA
claims a "fundamental right" to abortion throughout all nine months
of pregnancy, and no government body at any
level would be able to "deny or interfere with" this right. Even the pro-choice NOW
readily acknowledges that FOCA would literally "sweep away hundreds of
anti-abortion laws [and] policies."
-
Obama has a
0% rating from the National Right to Life Committee and
100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America.
-
As a state senator, Obama opposed Illinois’ Born Alive
Infant Protection Act,
which would have protected infants who were born alive and survived
their botched abortions. And what’s just as bad:
Obama has repeatedly
lied about this during his campaign.
-
The Supreme Court ruling in
Gonzales vs. Carhart
upheld the federal ban on an abortion procedure called "Intact D&E" (aka
"partial birth abortion"). In this procedure, a doctor dilates a woman’s
cervix, reaches up into the uterus, grabs the unborn child by the legs,
and pulls it down into the birth canal. The doctor then uses a long pair
of Metzenbaum scissors to puncture a hole in the back of the baby’s
skull. A vacuum tube is then inserted, and the contents of the skull are
emptied out. Yet on the day the Court upheld the ban on this horrific
procedure, Obama said, "I strongly disagree with today's Supreme
Court ruling. . .I am extremely concerned that this ruling will
embolden state legislatures to enact further measures to restrict a
woman's right to choose."
In other words, Barack Obama has given every
indication that, as President, he would be the most ardent defender of
unrestricted and unfettered abortion ever to hold the nation's highest
office.
Kmiec also misleadingly asserts that Obama "add[ed]
language to the Democratic platform affirming the choice of a mother to
keep her child." The truth is that the Democratic Party's new platform
on abortion is actually more pro-abortion than ever – a fact that
even pro-choice leaders have acknowledged.
In addition, in his discussion regarding Catholics, Kmiec makes no mention of the fact
that the Catholic Church's opposition to abortion dates back to
its
earliest days of existence. (See Didache 2:2, A.D. 70).
First-century
Jews were also very much opposed to abortion.
In
July 2004, before he became Pope Benedict XVI,
Cardinal Ratzinger
reiterated, "Christians have a 'grave obligation of conscience not to
cooperate formally in practices which, even if permitted by civil
legislation, are contrary to God’s law. Indeed, from the moral
standpoint, it is never licit to cooperate formally in evil. [...] This
cooperation can never be justified either by invoking respect for the
freedom of others or by appealing to the fact that civil law permits it
or requires it'."
Douglas Kmiec was
once a respected member of the Catholic community. He is no longer. He
has embarrassed the Church and scandalized the truth.
Shame on Dr. Kmiec.
Shame on him.